Best backup software 2026: what IT leaders need to know
TL;DR: Backup tools today must prove they can restore fast and resist tampering. For enterprise virtualization, Veeam Backup & Replication remains the top choice for sub-hour RTOs and instant VM recovery. Nakivo is the best value pick for SMBs that want predictable costs and quick deployment. Backblaze is the simplest unlimited cloud backup for individuals and small teams. Acronis bundles backup with active malware protection for consumer/corporate endpoints, and EaseUS stands out for raw backup speed. Prioritize RTO/RPO, immutable copies, testable restores and a clear TCO before buying.
Key terms (quick glossary)
- RTO (Recovery Time Objective): How quickly a system must be restored after failure.
- RPO (Recovery Point Objective): How much data loss is acceptable measured in time (minutes/hours).
- Immutable backups: Backups that cannot be altered or deleted for a defined retention window (protects against ransomware).
- Deduplication: Eliminating redundant data to save storage and bandwidth.
- CBT (Change-Block Tracking): Only backing up changed disk blocks to speed incremental backups.
- Instant VM recovery: Booting a VM directly from backup storage to meet tight RTOs.
Why 2026 is different for backup and recovery
Virtualization dominates the data center and ransomware attacks are more targeted and faster. Vendors have responded with instant-restore capabilities, immutable storage, integrated malware scanning, and even courier-based drive restores for very large cloud recoveries. That makes feature checklists noisier—but features without reliable, repeatable restores won’t save you when production fails.
Quick comparison — at a glance
| Product | Best for | Instant VM recovery | Immutable backups | Pricing (sample) | Standout drawback |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veeam Backup & Replication | Enterprise virtualization / low RTOs | Yes (industry-leading) | Yes | Entry ~$3.50/workload/month (Q1 2026 list) | Complexity and integration cost at scale |
| Nakivo Backup & Replication | SMBs and budget-conscious teams | Yes | Yes | Entry ~$2.45/workload/month; perpetual licensing available | Fewer enterprise management bells and whistles |
| Acronis True Image | Consumers / home office with security needs | Limited for enterprise VMs | Provided via cloud/archive options | Consumer tier ~ $60/year | Subscription only; weaker macOS support |
| EaseUS ToDo Backup | Speed-focused backups for SMBs | Basic VM support | Depends on edition | Business tiers ~$9.90/user/month | Less orchestration for complex DR |
| Backblaze | Individuals and simple team cloud backup | No (cloud-first restores) | Provides retention options; immutable via B2 with settings | Personal ~$60/year; courier restores $99–$189 | Limited enterprise customization |
Vendor snapshots — what you need to know
Veeam Backup & Replication
Best for: Enterprises running VMware vSphere or Hyper-V that require short RTOs and sophisticated orchestration.
Strengths: Fast instant VM recovery, robust change tracking, strong immutability options and integrated malware scanning. Proven at scale in virtualized environments.
Weaknesses: Operational complexity and higher lifecycle cost once you add connectors, tape/archive, and advanced orchestration.
Pricing note: Expect entry list pricing around $3.50 per workload/month (Q1 2026); actual TCO increases with retention, proxy infrastructure and support tiers.
Veeam is the best backup software provider of 2026 for enterprise virtualization and sub-hour recovery needs.
Nakivo Backup & Replication
Best for: SMBs and teams who need quick deployment, strong deduplication and predictable licensing.
Strengths: Fast setup (initial jobs often under 30 minutes), efficient deduplication, and the option for perpetual licensing—useful for predictable budgets.
Weaknesses: Less polished enterprise management console and fewer large-enterprise integrations compared to Veeam.
Pricing note: Entry comparisons around $2.45 per workload/month; perpetual licenses available as an alternative.
Setup and initial job configuration can be completed in under 30 minutes.
Acronis True Image
Best for: Consumer, remote worker and small-office environments that want backup plus active cyberprotection.
Strengths: Combines file/image backup with real-time anti-malware features—useful to prevent backups from becoming a vector for reinfection.
Weaknesses: Subscription-only pricing and weaker macOS parity; not targeted at large-scale VM orchestration.
Pricing note: Consumer tier commonly priced around $60/year (promotional and region-specific differences apply).
EaseUS ToDo Backup
Best for: Environments where raw backup throughput matters—fast on-prem backups for SMBs and branch offices.
Strengths: Exceptional backup speeds; during testing a 700 GB dataset completed in ~13 minutes thanks to aggressive compression and throughput.
Weaknesses: Lacks enterprise-grade orchestration and advanced automated DR testing tools compared with Veeam.
Backblaze
Best for: Individuals, freelancers and small teams who want a simple, unlimited cloud backup.
Strengths: Set-and-forget simplicity, unlimited personal backup, straightforward pricing and optional courier drive restore (approx. $99–$189 per use).
Weaknesses: Not designed as a full enterprise disaster-recovery platform; customization and orchestration are limited.
A true set-and-forget unlimited cloud backup with courier recovery if needed.
How the testing was done (methodology & key metrics)
Products were evaluated across vendor-agnostic simulated failure scenarios: virtualized workloads on VMware vSphere and Hyper-V hosts, physical Windows/Linux servers, and hybrid cloud VMs. Testbed highlights:
- Network: 10GbE lab backbone with simulated WAN links for cloud/replication tests.
- Datasets: mixed file sets, databases and VM images; a 700 GB representative dataset used for speed benchmarks.
- Metrics measured: backup throughput (GB/min), compression/deduplication ratio, incremental backup size, time-to-first-byte on restores, full-VM restore time, time-to-application-consistency, and restore verification success rate.
- Resilience tests: partial-storage corruption, ransomware-infected file injection pre-backup, and region outage simulation requiring failover.
Results favored solutions that consistently completed restores and passed verification, not merely those that posted fast backup windows. EaseUS achieved the fastest raw backup in one run (~700 GB in ~13 minutes). Veeam delivered near-instant VM recovery in several failover drills—critical when RTOs are measured in minutes. Nakivo repeatedly demonstrated rapid setup and efficient deduplication, keeping storage and bandwidth costs down for SMB scenarios.
Decision flow: which path should you take?
- If your RTO target is under 1 hour → Prioritize instant VM recovery and local cache; evaluate Veeam for enterprise virtualization.
- If predictable costs and fast deployment matter → Consider Nakivo with perpetual license options for SMBs.
- If you need set-and-forget cloud backup for users → Backblaze is the simplest choice; use B2 or another vendor for business-grade controls.
- If you want backup plus active endpoint protection → Acronis offers integrated cyberprotection for endpoints.
- If backup window speed is the priority → Test EaseUS for your workload profile; fast backups reduce backup window risk.
Three-year TCO example (simple model)
Estimate based on vendor list entry pricing as of Q1 2026. Real costs vary with retention, storage tiering, egress and support.
- Scenario: 100 workloads / VMs; basic retention; vendor entry pricing only.
- Veeam: $3.50/workload/month → $350/month → ~$4,200/year → ~ $12,600 over 3 years. Add proxies, storage, and support for production deployments—expect multiples of entry cost.
- Nakivo: $2.45/workload/month → $245/month → ~$2,940/year → ~$8,820 over 3 years. Perpetual license alternative can reduce long-term spend for stable environments.
- Backblaze: personal at ~$60/year is per user; business pricing varies. For large datasets, B2 storage costs and egress need factoring.
TCO tip: always model storage growth, egress/restore scenarios, and the operational cost of restore drills and automation.
Mini case studies — quick lessons
SMB ransomware hit, recovered in hours
A 60-seat managed service customer running Nakivo with immutable retention detected encrypted files and isolated infected endpoints. Immutable backups prevented over-write, and recovery of affected file shares and several VMs completed within a half-day. Lesson: immutability + tested restores shorten downtime and negotiation windows.
Enterprise region outage, instant VM recovery saved an ecommerce window
A large retailer used Veeam orchestration to boot critical checkout VMs from backup repositories in a secondary site. Customers continued to check out during a primary-site outage. Lesson: instant VM recovery + automated failover runbooks deliver business continuity when minutes matter.
Procurement checklist — what to demand
- Define RTO and RPO by application and service before vendor demos.
- Require restore verification and have vendors demonstrate a full restore for a production-like workload.
- Insist on immutable/air-gapped storage and explain the implementation (WORM, object-lock, hardware immutability).
- Check platform support (VMware vSphere, Hyper-V, Nutanix, physical servers, major cloud providers).
- Test deduplication and compression on your data profile, not vendor demos.
- Understand pricing components: per-workload, per-GB, storage tier, egress, courier restore fees, and optional support.
- Validate orchestration and automated DR testing capabilities for planned failovers.
- Run a short PoC: a week for backups and a timed restore drill.
Common procurement pitfalls
- Buying solely on backup speed without testing restores and verification.
- Ignoring egress and restore costs when choosing cloud backup options.
- Assuming immutable equals invincible—immutability must be paired with detection, isolation and orchestration.
- Underestimating operational overhead: complex enterprise solutions need skilled staff and automation investment.
- Choosing subscription over perpetual without modeling multi-year spend and growth.
FAQ for CIOs and IT leaders
Which backup product is best for enterprise virtualization?
Veeam Backup & Replication — because of its instant VM recovery, mature change-tracking and enterprise-grade orchestration. Expect higher operational complexity and higher lifecycle costs.
Which solution offers the best value for SMBs?
Nakivo Backup & Replication — fast to deploy, good deduplication and the option for perpetual licensing keep predictable costs down while covering common virtualization and physical server needs.
Can backup tools effectively defend against ransomware?
They reduce risk: immutable backups, malware scanning and air-gapped copies make recovery possible. But backups are one layer—prevention, detection and response must be in place too.
How often should we test restores?
At minimum quarterly for key applications and monthly for mission-critical systems. Automated, scheduled verification tests should be part of any modern backup strategy.
Final notes and next steps
Backup is a business continuity decision, not a checkbox. Start with RTO/RPO, run a focused PoC that includes timed restores, model three-year costs including storage and egress, and demand immutable retention and automated verification. For many enterprises the priority is fast, orchestrated VM recovery (Veeam); for many SMBs, Nakivo balances capability with cost. Backblaze will keep users backed up with minimal fuss, while Acronis and EaseUS serve niche needs around endpoint security and speed.
Download a procurement checklist, run a one-week PoC, and schedule a failover drill before you commit—restores, not brochures, are the final test.